Top Challenges in Building Enterprise LLM Applications

Building and deploying large language models (LLMs) enterprise applications comes with technical and operational challenges. 

The promise of LLMs has sparked a surge of interest and investment in the enterprise sector. Recent industry reports highlight the growing adoption of LLMs for tackling complex business problems, ranging from streamlining operations to improving customer experiences.

Building and implementing effective LLM applications requires addressing various technical, operational, and UI/UX considerations, ensuring that these models are used responsibly and deliver tangible value to businesses and users.

This guide explores organizations’ key challenges when building enterprise LLM applications. We will explore the impact of data complexity and quality on model outputs, the resource-intensive nature of model training and fine-tuning, and the operational considerations of deploying and maintaining these models in production environments.

Organizations can use LLMs to drive innovation and enhance their operations by understanding these challenges and the strategies to address them.

TL;DR

• Data Quality is Key: Poor data leads to biased or inaccurate LLM outputs, impacting performance and reliability. Invest in diverse and representative datasets to ensure fair and accurate results.
• Training is Resource Intensive: Building enterprise-grade LLMs requires substantial computational resources and financial investment. Explore efficient scaling laws and sustainable practices to optimize training costs.
• Domain-Specific Fine-Tuning: Adapting pre-trained models to specific tasks through fine-tuning is crucial for maximizing their utility: leverage transfer learning and fine-tuning methods to tailor LLMs to your industry’s needs.
• Scalability and Performance Optimization: Overcoming scalability challenges involves distributed computing and performance optimization techniques like model pruning and quantization. Explore innovative solutions to ensure LLMs meet real-time application demands.
• UX Drives Adoption: Designing intuitive interfaces and user-friendly experiences is essential for widespread LLM adoption. Implement features that minimize jargon, provide clear instructions, and incorporate user feedback mechanisms to enhance usability and trust.

Technical Challenges

Building and deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) presents many technical challenges that organizations must navigate to achieve scalability and robustness.  These challenges are interconnected and can significantly impact the performance, reliability, and efficiency of enterprise LLM systems.

Data Complexity and Quality

The quality and complexity of data are crucial in the training of LLMs.  Poor data quality can introduce noise, biases, and inaccuracies, leading to several critical issues. This section delves into these issues, supported by recent research and findings.

Biased Outputs

LLMs trained on biased data can perpetuate and even amplify societal stereotypes and discrimination. For instance, this study showed Google’s hate-speech detection algorithm, Perspective, exhibited bias against African-American Vernacular English (AAVE), often misclassifying it as toxic due to insufficient representation in the training data. This highlights the importance of diverse and representative datasets.

Research by Blodgett et al. (2020) emphasizes the need for clear definitions of bias and fairness in LLMs, noting that biases can stem from training data, model design and evaluation practices. Recent research on detecting unanticipated bias in Large Language Models has shown that biases in LLMs can manifest as both representational harms (reinforcing stereotypes) and allocational harms (unequal distribution of resources).

Inaccurate Information

LLMs are prone to generating factually incorrect responses, a phenomenon known as “hallucinations.” This can lead to the spread of misinformation, which poses a significant risk, especially in scientific and educational contexts. An Oxford study highlighted that LLMs often produce untruthful responses, which can undermine their utility in providing reliable information.

To combat this, researchers have proposed various strategies, such as leveraging external knowledge sources and refining model generation processes to improve the factuality of LLM outputs. However, research shows that automatic evaluation of factual accuracy remains a challenge, necessitating ongoing research and the development of robust evaluation frameworks.

Reduced Performance

Inconsistent or noisy data can degrade the performance of LLMs, making them less effective in providing meaningful insights. A study by UCL researchers found that LLMs often generate biased content with strong stereotypical associations that conform to traditional gender roles. This affects the quality of the generated content and limits the model’s applicability in diverse contexts.

Researchers are exploring methods to detect and mitigate biases in LLMs to address these issues. For example, counterfactual inputs and coreference resolution tasks can help evaluate and reduce biases in model outputs. 

Additionally, improving data quality through better curation and preprocessing techniques is crucial for enhancing model performance and reliability.

Issues Related to Bias and Language

Bias in LLMs is a significant concern, as these models often learn from vast and diverse datasets sourced from the internet, which inherently contain biases:

• Selection Bias: Occurs when the training data does not represent the target population, leading to skewed model outputs.
• Implicit Bias: Subtle biases embedded in the data can unexpectedly influence the model’s behavior, perpetuating harmful stereotypes.

To mitigate these biases, curating high-quality, diverse datasets and performing regular algorithmic audits is crucial. Including human oversight in the loop can also help identify and correct biases that automated systems might miss.

Model Training and Fine-Tuning

Training and fine-tuning LLMs are resource-intensive processes that involve substantial computational costs and technical expertise.

Training Computational Costs and Resource Requirements 

Training enterprise-grade LLM models requires extensive computational resources, primarily due to the vast parameter spaces and the need for high-end GPUs or specialized AI hardware. 
For example, training OpenAI’s GPT-3 required an estimated $4.6 million, while GPT-4’s training costs soared to approximately $78 million. The computational demands are financial and environmental, as the energy consumption for large-scale training can be substantial.

Is it possible to estimate the relationship between training cost and the model quality?

A Deepmind research paper discusses optimizing the balance between model size and training duration. The Chinchilla Scaling Law is the most widely cited scaling law for LLMs. The Chinchilla paper asked: If you have a fixed training compute budget, how should you balance model size and training duration to produce the highest quality model?

The Chinchilla Scaling Law proposes an optimal token-to-parameter ratio to maximize model quality within a fixed compute budget. This law suggests that training smaller models on more data can achieve similar or better performance than larger models trained on less data, thereby reducing overall training costs and improving efficiency.

Is it possible to deploy a large-scale training compute cluster efficiently and sustainably? Let’s look at recent developments of xAI’s supercluster, the biggest computing engine developed for training AI systems as of today.

xAI’s Memphis Supercluster, described as the world’s most powerful AI training cluster, is equipped with 100,000 Nvidia H100 chips. This immense computational power is necessary to handle the extensive data processing and complex calculations required for advanced AI training. A single RDMA (Remote Direct Memory Access) fabric facilitates high-speed data transfer between these chips, optimizing performance and reducing latency.

The supercomputer’s substantial energy and water requirements pose significant challenges. The facility demands up to 150 megawatts of electricity, equivalent to powering 100,000 homes, and requires 1 to 1.5 million gallons of water per day for cooling. 

To address these needs sustainably, xAI plans to use recycled water from a nearby wastewater treatment plant, reducing the strain on Memphis’s drinking water supply. Additionally, xAI is committed to constructing a new power substation and a greywater processing facility to support the data center’s operations and enhance local infrastructure.

We can see how challenging it is to deploy a large-scale computer to train these AI systems. Companies with fewer resources are not well positioned to compete unless research drives innovation to make training AI systems more efficient and accessible.

Domain-Specific Adaptation

To maximize the utility of LLMs, domain-specific adaptation through fine-tuning is often necessary. This involves using transfer learning techniques, where a pre-trained model is adapted to specific tasks or domains. 

The Mad Devs Study shows the effectiveness of models like BERT and GPT-3 in leveraging transfer learning to enhance performance across various NLP tasks. Additionally, domain-specific fine-tuning can significantly improve model accuracy and relevance, as demonstrated in healthcare and finance applications.

• Transfer Learning: This technique allows models to leverage pre-existing knowledge from large datasets and apply it to specific tasks, reducing the need for extensive retraining. For instance, Google’s T5 model employs a unified “text-to-text” approach, enabling efficient transfer learning across different NLP tasks.

• Fine-Tuning Methods: Fine-tuning involves updating the weights of a pre-trained model using a labeled dataset specific to the target task. Methods such as instruction fine-tuning and full fine-tuning are commonly used to optimize model performance for specific applications.

Scalability and Performance

Scaling LLMs to handle large workloads is challenging due to their substantial memory and computational resource requirements. Traditional single-server setups often fall short, necessitating distributed systems to manage the load. 

Scalability is a significant challenge when deploying LLMs. These models require extensive computational resources, which can strain infrastructure, especially when scaling to handle large workloads. The need for distributed computing to manage vast datasets and high-throughput inference demands sophisticated infrastructure and optimized algorithms.

Performance Optimizations

Optimizing performance for real-time applications involves addressing latency and throughput issues. Techniques such as model pruning, quantization, and distillation can reduce model size and improve inference speed without significantly compromising accuracy.

Innovations such as FlashDecoding++ and FlashAttention-3 have been developed to optimize GPU utilization and reduce latency, ensuring that LLMs can serve real-time applications effectively. However, these optimizations often require specialized hardware and software configurations, adding to the complexity of deployment.

Deployment Infrastructure Costs

Managing infrastructure costs at the deployment stage is another critical challenge. The substantial computational power required for LLMs can lead to high operational expenses. 

Enterprises must balance the need for powerful hardware with cost-effective solutions. Utilizing cloud services and hybrid models that combine on-premises and cloud resources can help mitigate these costs. Additionally, tools like LLaMPS enable enterprises to maximize their existing hardware investments by distributing workloads across available resources.

💡 Pro Tip: Learn how Aporia makes AI secure and reliable through guardrails.

Operational Challenges

Deploying and maintaining large language models (LLM) systems in production environments presents several operational challenges. These challenges span from the initial deployment to ongoing maintenance and cost management.

Deployment and Maintenance

Making LLMs Production-Ready

Transitioning LLMs from development to production involves several steps to ensure they are robust, efficient, and secure. Key challenges include:

• Scalability and Performance: Ensuring the model can handle real-world data at scale without significant degradation in performance. This often involves optimizing the model architecture and leveraging distributed computing resources.
• Security: Implementing robust security measures to protect sensitive data and prevent adversarial attacks. This includes secure data handling, adversarial training, and comprehensive monitoring.
• Resource Management: Efficiently manage computational resources, particularly GPUs, critical for LLM inference. Serverless architectures can offer a scalable solution but come with challenges like resource constraints and statelessness.

💡 Pro Tip: Discover how Aporia’s Guardrails system enhances the security and reliability of audio and text AI in real-time.

Continuous Monitoring and Updating

Once deployed, LLMs require continuous monitoring and maintenance to ensure they remain effective and secure:

• Performance Monitoring: Utilizing diagnostic tools to monitor system components and events, identifying root causes of issues, and implementing fault tolerance mechanisms.
• Regular Updates: Periodically update the model to incorporate new data and address any discovered vulnerabilities or performance issues.

Strategies for Cost Reduction

As discussed earlier, several strategies can help manage and reduce these costs:

• Frugal GPT: This approach involves using a combination of different LLMs based on the specific requirements of each query. By adapting prompts and approximating LLM responses, FrugalGPT can reduce costs by up to 98% while maintaining performance.
• Model Distillation: Employing techniques like sequence-level knowledge distillation to create smaller, more efficient models that retain the performance of larger models but at a fraction of the cost.

• Cost-Performance Trade-offs: Regularly evaluate the cost-performance trade-offs of different deployment strategies and model configurations.
• Optimization Techniques: Implement optimization techniques such as operator optimization, data pipeline improvements, and network performance tuning to enhance efficiency and reduce costs.

User Experience and Adoption Challenges

The widespread adoption of LLM applications hinges on a seamless user experience (UX) and a well-prepared organizational environment. Addressing the following challenges is crucial to ensure the successful integration of LLMs within organizations:

User Interface and Experience

While powerful, LLMs can be intimidating for users unfamiliar with their capabilities. Designing intuitive interfaces that simplify interactions and communicate the LLM’s functions is paramount. A user-friendly interface should:

• Minimize jargon and technical terms: Use clear, concise language that avoids overwhelming users with complex terminology.
• Provide clear instructions and examples: Guide users on interacting with the LLM and provide illustrative examples of queries and responses.
• Offer context-sensitive help: Integrate tooltips or help menus that offer guidance specific to the task the user is trying to accomplish.
• Incorporate feedback mechanisms: Allow users to rate responses, report errors, or provide suggestions, enabling continuous improvement of the LLM.

Let’s study UI/UX innovations from widely used LLM applications and what we can learn from them.

Perplexity AI 

Perplexity has implemented several innovative design elements that distinguish its user interface (UI) from other AI-powered tools. These elements focus on enhancing user experience, building trust, and making information retrieval as efficient and intuitive as possible.

Transparency and System Status Visibility

One of the standout features of Perplexity’s UI is its emphasis on bringing the user through the journey of information retrieval and answer generation. 

When a user submits a query, Perplexity provides real-time updates such as “Considering 8 sources” or “Researched and summarized” to indicate the AI’s progress and actions. This transparency reassures users that the system is working and builds trust by making the process more understandable and relatable.

Contextual Follow-Up Prompts

Perplexity AI predicts potential follow-up questions based on the initial query and displays them at the end of each answer to enhance user engagement and ease of use. 

This feature reduces the cognitive load on users by providing them with relevant next steps without requiring them to think of additional questions themselves. It mirrors natural human conversation, making the interaction more intuitive and fluid.

Discover Section

Perplexity includes a “Discover” section that features daily new and broadly interesting topics. This section is curated to engage users even when they do not have a specific query, encouraging exploration and interaction with the AI.

Similarly, Claude has made innovations via its artifact panel, which can render real-time code, and OpenAI introduced Custom GPTs to augment ChatGPT for personal use cases.

UI/UX is a crucial element of enterprise-grade LLM systems because it directly impacts productivity, user engagement, cognitive load, trust, customization, and collaboration. By prioritizing intuitive design, transparency, and user-centric features, organizations can ensure that their LLM systems are effective, widely adopted, and used to their full potential.

Conclusion

Organizations can successfully navigate the complexities of LLM development and deployment by understanding the challenges related to data quality, training resources, domain adaptation, scalability, and user experience. Implementing effective strategies to address these challenges will enable enterprises to harness the full potential of LLMs, driving innovation, improving efficiency, and delivering exceptional user experiences.

💡 Pro Tip: Delve into Aporia’s 2024 Benchmark Report to gain insights into the unique multiSLM Detection Engine. 

FAQ